WebPagetest Forums
Chrome Document Complete 0ms - Printable Version

+- WebPagetest Forums (https://www.webpagetest.org/forums)
+-- Forum: WebPagetest (/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Bugs/Issues (/forumdisplay.php?fid=10)
+--- Thread: Chrome Document Complete 0ms (/showthread.php?tid=12424)



Chrome Document Complete 0ms - craveytrain - 07-25-2013 06:00 AM

We are having an issue on some of our pages where WPT is showing 0ms document complete and 0 requests by document complete. Other numbers such as TTFB and speed index are as expected. The page is functional in Chrome and the dev tools give proper numbers for document complete, just the WPT version doesn't. Any ideas?

URL: http://www.retailmenot.com/s/shoes
WPT: http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130724_ZA_1NE5/


RE: Chrome Document Complete 0ms - craveytrain - 07-30-2013 03:38 AM

To follow up, we are still getting these errors, both in wpt.org and our private instance. The odd thing is, not all our site behaves this way. Our home page and other pages seem to be working. The only correlation I can draw is that the pages that we are using this on we also use the history api. Could there be an issue with that?


RE: Chrome Document Complete 0ms - pmeenan - 07-30-2013 06:02 AM

Hmm, could be tripping up my navigation code because WPT reports the time of the last onload event and it could be getting reset. I opened up a bug to track it: https://github.com/WPO-Foundation/webpagetest/issues/100


RE: Chrome Document Complete 0ms - rsacramento - 08-13-2013 02:51 PM

I also have the same issue on http://www.webpagetest.org/result/130813_AY_62F/
Is already a bug (confirmed)?


RE: Chrome Document Complete 0ms - rsacramento - 08-13-2013 10:23 PM

I am using WPT site. What means "pages that are using history api"?
The loaded and fully loaded times are the same because there is some bug in onload Chrome event of this WPT version, correct?


RE: Chrome Document Complete 0ms - pmeenan - 08-13-2013 10:44 PM

Yes, you can follow the github bug but I haven't had a chance to look into it yet.