WebPagetest Forums
Is 250ms load time acceptable for blank php page? - Printable Version

+- WebPagetest Forums (https://www.webpagetest.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Web Performance (/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Optimization Discussions (/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: Is 250ms load time acceptable for blank php page? (/showthread.php?tid=12958)



Is 250ms load time acceptable for blank php page? - postcd - 05-07-2014 07:19 AM

Hello,

I used page speed tester ( http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/dh8Icv/http://internetlifeforum.com/test.php ) which server is located in same City like my website and this tester connected to my server in 2 miliseconds. Then it waited 200 long miliseconds to get the reply.
I want to know why my server takes such long time to respond blank page request.... which commands i need to do on my redhat, apache server?


RE: Is 250ms load time acceptable for blank php page? - davidtrounce - 05-07-2014 08:33 AM

First, try a series of tests at different times of the day. Also, can you post the results from the test you did here in this thread?


RE: Is 250ms load time acceptable for blank php page? - davidtrounce - 05-08-2014 12:43 AM

Hi,

Got your message. It is looking like a server side cache issue, but I need to think about it some more. The fact that it is blank should not concern you too much. More important are the pages you are acutally using live on your site.

I signed up while I was there, by the way - nice forum!


RE: Is 250ms load time acceptable for blank php page? - pmeenan - 05-15-2014 12:34 AM

FWIW, I've had a LOT better luck for php performance using nginx, php-fpm and APC. WebPagetest used to be hosted on Apache but I ran into both scaling and performance issues. Moving to the Nginx stack I can now serve rich PHP responses in < 10ms (was 150-200ms on Apache).

I'm sure it's possible to scale and tune Apache to perform that well but it's somewhat more involved and Nginx "just worked" for me.