WebPagetest Forums
First View vs. Repeat - Raw Object Data results exactly the same - Printable Version

+- WebPagetest Forums (https://www.webpagetest.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Web Performance (/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discuss Test Results (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: First View vs. Repeat - Raw Object Data results exactly the same (/showthread.php?tid=12994)



First View vs. Repeat - Raw Object Data results exactly the same - FAST1 - 05-26-2014 10:50 AM

I ran the Webpage Performance Test on http://www.w3.org/.

In downloading and reviewing the Raw Object Data results, I see that, though the Raw Page Data results are indeed different for First View vs. Repeat View, the Raw Object Data results seems to be the exact same for both. That is, the results for the Repeat run seem to be exactly the same as the First Run results; essentially a copy.

For the Repeat View, I would typically expect to see the smaller number of requests reflected in the Objects results, as is the case with the Page results.

I notice this regardless of the URL used.

Perhaps someone can advise as to where I am going wrong?


RE: First View vs. Repeat - Raw Object Data results exactly the same - pmeenan - 05-27-2014 11:58 PM

Can you link to the test result so we're working off of the same details? Could be a bug on the server side where it's returning the first-view data instead of repeat view.


RE: First View vs. Repeat - Raw Object Data results exactly the same - FAST1 - 05-30-2014 08:06 AM

Sure, here is the URL for the test I performed:
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/140526_TS_1R8/

Not only are the objects the exact same, for cached vs non-cached runs/views, the values are exactly the same.


RE: First View vs. Repeat - Raw Object Data results exactly the same - pmeenan - 05-31-2014 12:39 AM

Thanks, should be fixed now: https://github.com/WPO-Foundation/webpagetest/commit/e4fb2b3a905acbfce9fbea17249d496e23903632 (stupid 1-line mistake on my part)


RE: First View vs. Repeat - Raw Object Data results exactly the same - FAST1 - 06-04-2014 05:13 AM

Thank you Patrick. Looks good!