Current time: 01-18-2021, 08:02 AM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Image compression results
07-14-2012, 09:56 AM
Post: #3
RE: Image compression results
You're right, it's pretty good! But maybe I should rephrase my question:

How WebPageTest can make such an assessment (ie, state that a gain of 40% is achievable as well known tools as jpegtrans, imagemagick can not even win one byte)?

It should be based on some specific tool/library that would be very interesting to know in order to try to achieve the above result (unless WebPageTest use JPEGMini? Smile).
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Image compression results - Florent - 07-13-2012, 11:12 PM
RE: Image compression results - perry - 07-14-2012, 06:37 AM
RE: Image compression results - Florent - 07-14-2012 09:56 AM
RE: Image compression results - pmeenan - 07-15-2012, 12:38 PM
RE: Image compression results - Florent - 07-17-2012, 12:58 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)