Image compression results
|
07-14-2012, 09:56 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Image compression results
You're right, it's pretty good! But maybe I should rephrase my question:
How WebPageTest can make such an assessment (ie, state that a gain of 40% is achievable as well known tools as jpegtrans, imagemagick can not even win one byte)? It should be based on some specific tool/library that would be very interesting to know in order to try to achieve the above result (unless WebPageTest use JPEGMini? ![]() |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Image compression results - Florent - 07-13-2012, 11:12 PM
RE: Image compression results - perry - 07-14-2012, 06:37 AM
RE: Image compression results - Florent - 07-14-2012 09:56 AM
RE: Image compression results - pmeenan - 07-15-2012, 12:38 PM
RE: Image compression results - Florent - 07-17-2012, 12:58 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)