Current time: 02-26-2021, 08:54 AM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
WebpageTest Videos
12-18-2009, 12:33 PM
Post: #4
RE: WebpageTest Videos
Wow! Pat, never expected a response time like that. Thanks, that's absolutely awesome. You're right, that's definitely in the area where it's more like a fluctuation than a substantial impact.

Knowing to compensate for a slight bit of wiggle room in at least the TTFB area when I'm tracking my numbers is more than easy enough to do and definitely makes the video even more worth it.

Thanks again,


(12-18-2009 05:38 AM)pmeenan Wrote:  I made some fairly significant gains in reducing the overhead. It's not completely eliminated but it is almost in the noise at this point.

Your Dev page:
Without Video - 1.26 sec fastest run
With Video - 1.34 sec fastest run
(the averages actually have the with video faster because of the swing in times)

Production page:
Without Video - 2.28 sec fastest run
With Video - 2.49 sec fastest run

I have some more radical ideas on making it even lighter weight but those changes are pretty extreme and I'm probably going to hold off on them if I can avoid it.

Let me know if you are still seeing issues or if you see any more problems pop up.


Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Messages In This Thread
WebpageTest Videos - jlamons - 12-17-2009, 12:14 PM
RE: WebpageTest Videos - pmeenan - 12-17-2009, 11:39 PM
RE: WebpageTest Videos - pmeenan - 12-18-2009, 05:38 AM
RE: WebpageTest Videos - jlamons - 12-18-2009 12:33 PM

Forum Jump:

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)