Current time: 11-12-2019, 12:47 PM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Slow Time to First Byte,
07-22-2015, 07:36 AM
Post: #11
RE: Slow Time to First Byte,
(07-19-2015 04:21 AM)Anton Chigurh Wrote:  The target TTFB is just a silly number and I see this every time on sites using CF - 168ms and this skews the results. In the test I just ran here you have .990ms as TTFB. Typically what I see on all of my sites is a target somewhere around 240-350ms, and 'A' grades for this follow. You're never going to have a TTFB of 168ms. It's unattainable. Unless of course you're just loading blank pages. The target FBT will be a much more realistic number once you completely get rid of CF, and so will the total FBT you actually get.
TTFB of 150ms or even below 100ms is definitely something attainable. It might be tricky, complex and expensive but you can achieve it.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Slow Time to First Byte, - zpinhead - 07-15-2015, 06:36 AM
RE: Slow Time to First Byte, - pmeenan - 07-16-2015, 02:17 AM
RE: Slow Time to First Byte, - zpinhead - 07-16-2015, 12:02 PM
RE: Slow Time to First Byte, - zpinhead - 07-17-2015, 11:13 PM
RE: Slow Time to First Byte, - pmeenan - 07-17-2015, 11:26 PM
RE: Slow Time to First Byte, - zpinhead - 07-17-2015, 11:49 PM
RE: Slow Time to First Byte, - zpinhead - 07-20-2015, 01:12 AM
RE: Slow Time to First Byte, - datadiggers - 07-22-2015 07:36 AM
RE: Slow Time to First Byte, - pmeenan - 07-18-2015, 03:22 AM
RE: Slow Time to First Byte, - zpinhead - 07-24-2015, 02:34 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)