cookies domains over more than 1 protocol
|
06-14-2014, 05:53 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
cookies domains over more than 1 protocol
Hello Community,
How does one simply implement a cookie-less domain solution when using more than 1 protocol (http/https)? For example: cookie-less domain used: http://www.abc.com http URL: http://www.xyz.com https URL: https://www.xyz.com In the HTTP state, the cookie-less domain will not prompt any mix content messages but it will most likely will prompt when in an HTTPS state (i.e. IE browsers). Any thoughts? Thanks. TRX |
|||
06-16-2014, 04:35 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: cookies domains over more than 1 protocol
1. Make sure the cookieless domain can support both HTTP and HTTPS
2. Reference the resources on it using a schemaless URL e.g. //www.abc.com i.e. URLs that don't start with http: or https: Andy Using WebPageTest - http://usingwpt.com/ |
|||
06-16-2014, 04:40 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: cookies domains over more than 1 protocol
I like #2. I've never tried it before. I'll give it a try and let you know how it goes. Thanks!
|
|||
06-17-2014, 05:06 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: cookies domains over more than 1 protocol
Only thing to watch out for with schema-less urls is CSS files and older versions of IE (doesn't break anything so probably worth ignoring at this point). Paul Irish has a good post on it here: http://www.paulirish.com/2010/the-protoc...ative-url/
|
|||
06-17-2014, 06:56 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: cookies domains over more than 1 protocol
I think Steve or Stoan have a post about one of the older IEs (7/8?) making duplicated requests with schemaless URLs but I couldn't find when I went looking
Andy Using WebPageTest - http://usingwpt.com/ |
|||
06-17-2014, 07:00 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: cookies domains over more than 1 protocol
Yeah, that would be the IE issue I mentioned ;-) It only impacts CSS resources that are imported or linked AFAIK and it just downloads twice but doesn't actually break the page - which seems like a fair thing to ignore for versions of IE that are very risky for users to be using at this point anyway.
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)