WebPagetest Forums
webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools - Printable Version

+- WebPagetest Forums (https://www.webpagetest.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Web Performance (/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discuss Test Results (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools (/showthread.php?tid=11560)



webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools - namon96 - 08-18-2012 09:34 AM

Hi all, I have a page on my mobilo toys website

This page passes the test for gzip encode with webpagetest but fails with yslow and chrome tools

What am I missing here

Cheers


RE: webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools - p83822 - 08-18-2012 10:20 AM

Stuff's coming through gzipped for me (and YSlow/Page Speed report it that way too).


RE: webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools - namon96 - 08-19-2012 04:35 AM

Thanks for the reply these are the results from YSlow and Chrome.
The stylesheets are at gogrid, I've also selected to compression enabled on the gogrid servers.

The result I get from YSlow

Grade F on Compress components with gzip

There are 7 plain text components that should be sent compressed

http://www.jadremtoys.com.au/mobilo/
http://gogrid.polimex-sino.com/jadremtoys/_styles/jadrem-spry-photo-compress.css
http://gogrid.polimex-sino.com/jadremtoys/_styles/jadremcompress-meganizr-1.css

Results from chrome

Compressing the following resources with gzip could reduce their transfer size by 140.1KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing http://ajax.googleapis.com/.../jquery.min.js could save 58.0KiB (64% reduction).
Compressing http://www.jadremtoys.com.au/mobilo/ could save 25.9KiB (73% reduction).
Compressing http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js could save 21.4KiB (59% reduction).
Compressing http://gogrid.polimex-sino.com/.../jadremcompress-meganizr-1.css could save 15.7KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://gogrid.polimex-sino.com/.../jadrem-spry-photo-compress.css could save 7.4KiB (79% reduction).
Compressing http://gogrid.polimex-sino.com/.../SpryAccordion.js could save 7.1KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing http://gogrid.polimex-sino.com/.../SpryTabbedPanels.js could save 4.7KiB (73% reduction).

Thanks for reading

cheers


RE: webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools - pmeenan - 08-21-2012 02:11 AM

Any chance you have a proxy or antivirus somewhere on your local network that would be disabling the accept-encoding header? Antivirus in particular is known to do that.


RE: webpagetest VS yslow - chrome tools - namon96 - 08-21-2012 06:39 AM

Doh! Well there you have it wasting time for a problem that didn't exist - yep the firewall.

Thanks again for your help Pat

Cheers
Norman