Looking for help on reducing Time To First Byte please!
|
05-15-2014, 07:52 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for help on reducing Time To First Byte please!
Hi all,
First off thank you in advance for any help you can offer, it'll go a long way and will be very much appreciated. http://www.webpagetest.org/result/140515...1/details/ In short I'm looking to reduce the time to first byte speed for the site which is currently sitting at 1.828s for the homepage. It has a clear correlation with search engine rankings compared to any other speed factor; so that's number 1 priority but obviously site speed in general is important. I have spoken to our webhosts (same firm as our web development) and they moved the site to a new (faster hardware) server which is the IP address you can see in the report. But unfortunately the TTFB speed has actually risen from 1.3 to 1.8 secs. It is shared hosting environment but I don't know how many other site's they've got on the server (a reverse IP lookup shows only us). Any actionable tips you can give that I can present to them would be very much appreciated. I'm not very clued up on this stuff unfortunately. The extent of my knowledge would be to optimise images and try to combine request files but that I'm trumped (don't even know if these would afffect TTFB anyway). Many thanks, Pete. |
|||
05-16-2014, 02:13 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Looking for help on reducing Time To First Byte please!
Let's find out how much some basic optimization might help the TTFB.
First of all, if you are on a linux server use the following code in your .htaccess file, to leverage browser cache of static assets. Just paste this at the top of the .htaccess file and save, then upload to overwrite: Code: <IfModule mod_expires.c> On the same page, you will see many alerts saying "Not Progressive" and a link is provided, "Anaylize JEPG" and clicking that link will cause WPT to present you three versions of the image. Choose the one which has the smallest file size, save to your desktop, rename to match what is on the server and upload to overwrite. Do this for each one which has the "Not Progressive" alert. I test and optimize to one set of test parameters only, regardless of distance and other factors. I use the Dulles, VA - IE 10 - Cable parameter exclusively, because of its reliability and repeatability, and also for IE 10 and 11 compliance which you want to observe. Here's my test for your site, using that parameter today: http://www.webpagetest.org/result/140515_BQ_ANG/ So each change or set of changes you make, test against this same parameter. On this page is your checklist for optimization. You can see here and from the grades posted above, you are failing in persistent connections as well. (That's "keep alive" enabled.) Quote:Applicable Objects : All objects that are from a domain that serves more than one object for the page (i.e. if only a single object is served from a given domain it will not be checked) Ignore the lack of CDN for now, let's first roll up your sleeves and do this basic optimization work first, then let's see where we are.Let's get rid of all of the F grades you are receiving, let's turn those into straight A grades first. |
|||
05-16-2014, 11:37 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Looking for help on reducing Time To First Byte please!
Hi Anton,
Thanks so much for your detailed breakdown and pointers. I'll forward this thread onto our web developers/hosts to see what they can do with the information and let you know if/when changes have been made. Much appreciated, Pete. (05-16-2014 02:13 AM)Anton Chigurh Wrote: Let's find out how much some basic optimization might help the TTFB. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)