First byte time grade / https
|
08-10-2011, 07:32 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
First byte time grade / https
Does the first byte time grading take into account whether the site is http or https ?
|
|||
08-10-2011, 11:00 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: First byte time grade / https
Yes. The SSL negotiation time is added to the baseline time (basically ignored).
|
|||
08-11-2011, 12:04 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: First byte time grade / https
Could it make sense to have a higher target first byte time for https sites, since they will always be slower than http ?
|
|||
08-11-2011, 01:15 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: First byte time grade / https
It does have a higher target - the SSL negotiation time is added to the target time that it would have received otherwise.
|
|||
08-11-2011, 01:39 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: First byte time grade / https
I've a https page which is rated D with :
First Byte Time (back-end processing): 65/100 447 ms First Byte Time 105 ms Target First Byte Time From the chart : Start Offset: 0.001 s DNS Lookup: 5 ms Initial Connection: 36 ms SSL Negotiation: 361 ms Time to First Byte: 43 ms Which looks like it meets the target first byte time of 105ms, when SSL is excluded. |
|||
08-11-2011, 01:49 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
RE: First byte time grade / https
Any chance you can share the test result (feel free to mail it to me at pmeenan@webpagetest.org if you don't want to post it here). Sounds like a bug that should be pretty easy to track down (and since the grade is calculated on the fly on the server I can fix it retroactively)
Thanks, -Pat |
|||
08-11-2011, 02:00 AM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: First byte time grade / https
Email sent.
|
|||
08-11-2011, 02:35 AM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: First byte time grade / https
All fixed, thanks. It's one of those embarrassingly stupid mistakes where a single missing character causes subtle mistakes (in this case I forgot to put a $ in front of the sslTime variable).
|
|||
08-11-2011, 03:19 AM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: First byte time grade / https
Thanks for fixing it so quickly - I'm now getting an A rating.
Just a thought - it might be worth having a fixed SSL target time too, so that a site with slow ssl negotiation gets a lower rating. |
|||
02-07-2012, 11:44 AM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: First byte time grade / https
Hi Patrick,
I am running the private instance in my machine and I face the similar problem discussed in this thread. The target first byte time is the time needed for DNS, socket and SSL negotiations + 100ms, but the value that I see in my results are not matching this formula. Thus, I always see 'F' grade for first byte time. I ran the performance test for the url https://gmail.com through webpagetest.com and the results can be found at http://www.webpagetest.org/result/120207_KS_34SGK/. For some reason, I am not seeing the ssl negotiations time in this result. I noticed the target first byte time is not matching the total of breakdown values. And, I also ran the performance test for the url https://gmail.com through private instance and noticed the target first byte time value is not according to the above formula. Results from the private instance: First Byte Time (back-end processing): 45/100 846 ms First Byte Time 300 ms Target First Byte Time URL: https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLogin...mplcache=2 Host: accounts.google.com IP: 74.125.53.84 Error/Status Code: 200 Start Offset: 0.527 s DNS Lookup: 30 ms Initial Connection: 70 ms SSL Negotiation: 141 ms Time to First Byte: 78 ms Content Download: 1057 ms Bytes In (downloaded): 15.4 KB Bytes Out (uploaded): 1.5 KB Also, please correct me if my understanding is wrong. Thanks |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)