Current time: 11-25-2020, 10:23 AM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Search Resault 96/100 But
08-17-2012, 11:43 PM
Post: #2
RE: Search Resault 96/100 But
Wow, I'm not sure how the page scored as well as it did because it looks like it managed to get a lot of serious problems through the optimization checks.

For starters, figure out where this is getting inserted in your configs:

Connection: keep-alive, close

The keep-alive is probably fooling the optimization checks but that "close" is absolutely evil, particularly on a https page. Your load time will be reduced by 60-75% just by fixing that one issue.

Why are you using max-age:0 for the content? That is telling the browser that the static content can't be cached. WebPagetest would have given you an F for caching static content but that value basically tells WebPagetest that the content is not-cacheable on purpose (which is clearly wrong for most of the static resources).

Not seeing the compression is a problem with the IE test agent in WebPagetest because IE hides the headers for https content. Try using Firefox where you should see the full original headers.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Messages In This Thread
Search Resault 96/100 But - SeoEngineer - 08-16-2012, 09:27 AM
RE: Search Resault 96/100 But - pmeenan - 08-17-2012 11:43 PM

Forum Jump:

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)