Site vs File (Browser Caching) Different? Why?
|
10-09-2013, 02:41 AM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Site vs File (Browser Caching) Different? Why?
(10-08-2013 07:43 PM)robzilla Wrote: Yeah, the age is now 593784 so apparently these files aren't purged properly. Hey robzilla, I got it all figured out. Thanks! I individually invalidated the files that were listed on the WPT page and the 3p_content; There was a previous directive in the NGINX config that was overriding the config I showed you. All fixed now :-) Thanks again, -Bill |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Site vs File (Browser Caching) Different? Why? - qops1981 - 10-04-2013, 04:32 AM
RE: Site vs File (Browser Caching) Different? Why? - robzilla - 10-07-2013, 07:26 PM
RE: Site vs File (Browser Caching) Different? Why? - qops1981 - 10-08-2013, 01:45 AM
RE: Site vs File (Browser Caching) Different? Why? - robzilla - 10-08-2013, 05:22 AM
RE: Site vs File (Browser Caching) Different? Why? - qops1981 - 10-08-2013, 06:17 AM
RE: Site vs File (Browser Caching) Different? Why? - robzilla - 10-08-2013, 06:49 AM
RE: Site vs File (Browser Caching) Different? Why? - qops1981 - 10-08-2013, 08:30 AM
RE: Site vs File (Browser Caching) Different? Why? - robzilla - 10-08-2013, 07:43 PM
RE: Site vs File (Browser Caching) Different? Why? - qops1981 - 10-09-2013 02:41 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)