Completely Automated webpagetest application
|
05-14-2011, 03:28 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Completely Automated webpagetest application
FWIW, you'll probably be a lot better off passing &f=xml and storing the result as XML which will be a lot easier to parse than the HTML. You'll still need to parse it though.
We have a python bulktest script that might be able to do what you are looking for: http://code.google.com/p/webpagetest/sou...Fbatchtool I think someone is working on adding API key support to it right now (it was actually meant for using against private instances so there wasn't really the need for key support. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Completely Automated webpagetest application - ruddh - 06-15-2010, 07:14 AM
RE: Completely Automated webpagetest application - pmeenan - 06-15-2010, 07:51 AM
RE: Completely Automated webpagetest application - Geebee - 02-28-2012, 06:22 PM
RE: Completely Automated webpagetest application - chainsaw - 03-07-2011, 05:25 AM
RE: Completely Automated webpagetest application - agraan - 05-14-2011, 03:24 AM
RE: Completely Automated webpagetest application - pmeenan - 05-14-2011 03:28 AM
RE: Completely Automated webpagetest application - pmeenan - 02-29-2012, 09:43 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)