MyBB Internal: One or more warnings occured. Please contact your administrator for assistance.
Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN
Current time: 12-06-2020, 12:50 PM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN
10-13-2011, 01:49 AM (This post was last modified: 10-13-2011 01:51 AM by jarrod1937.)
Post: #1
Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN
Here is some preliminary testing between MaxCDN and Akamai:

54 KB file, San Jose CA, IE8, 1.5 Megabit DSL

Load Time: 0.516 seconds
First Byte: 0.180 seconds

Load Time: 0.498 seconds
First Byte: 0.186 seconds

4 KB file, San Jose CA, IE8, 1.5 Megabit DSL

Load Time: 0.214 seconds
First Byte: 0.176 seconds

Load Time: 0.232 seconds
First Byte: 0.188 seconds

I've tested at different location and the results are pretty similar. The interesting thing is that Akamai seems to almost always do slightly worse than MaxCDN when it comes to total load time, despite Akamai having the better time to first byte. Though the 4KB file shows Akamai having a better load time.
I'll keep everyone updated, I have to add some more cnames and I'll be doing web page speed tests.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Messages In This Thread
Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - jarrod1937 - 10-13-2011 01:49 AM
RE: Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - pmeenan - 10-13-2011, 01:57 AM
RE: Akamai Versus NetDNA/MaxCDN - Marvin - 10-18-2011, 03:50 AM

Forum Jump:

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)