IE8 == Worse Performance?
|
07-02-2010, 06:15 AM
Post: #21
|
|||
|
|||
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance?
What latencies should i try?
|
|||
07-02-2010, 09:52 AM
Post: #22
|
|||
|
|||
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance?
Try 0 and 120 - just anything radically different to throw off the timings.
|
|||
07-02-2010, 03:42 PM
Post: #23
|
|||
|
|||
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance?
Hi Pat
Just a few comments: - Aptimize pioneered the technique of automatically converting CSS background images into base64 encoded format – this is for both browsers that support data:uri notation and IE6 & IE7 using MHTML. - The Aptimize Website Accelerator product family also support running in the cloud. Best Derek Watson CTO, Aptimize. (06-27-2010 11:14 PM)pmeenan Wrote: Looks like ADC is the app accelerator-side of a CDN (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application..._network). I had to Google for it though (which is probably a good indicator that they need to explain a bit more). |
|||
07-02-2010, 09:35 PM
Post: #24
|
|||
|
|||
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance?
(07-02-2010 03:42 PM)Aptimize Wrote: Hi Pat Great, thanks Derek. Looks like there are lots of options for sites on shared hosting to automate the optimizations - that's excellent news. |
|||
07-03-2010, 12:05 AM
Post: #25
|
|||
|
|||
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance?
(07-02-2010 09:52 AM)pmeenan Wrote: Try 0 and 120 - just anything radically different to throw off the timings.The connection view is still quite spacey even at 0 ms: http://www.webpagetest.org/result/100702...01ba0c348/ But not spacey at all under 120 ms: http://www.webpagetest.org/result/100702...8070c0bb0/ |
|||
07-06-2010, 10:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-06-2010 10:19 PM by green-watch.org.)
Post: #26
|
|||
|
|||
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance?
Does anyone have any price quotes on aptimize and / or strangeloop?
Monthly fee? One time fee? If it is too expensive, I will probably hold off for now. However, it is something I may consider for the future but I would like to have some sort of cost expectation. This is a little off topic but Is Frankfurt, DE a city in Delaware? When I first looked at it I thought DE stood for denmark ![]() |
|||
07-06-2010, 10:31 PM
Post: #27
|
|||
|
|||
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance?
lol, I need to get more consistent about using country codes as more international locations get added. Eventually I'm planning on having the location picker be a map which should help.
I don't have specific pricing information but it is going to depend on how you use the solution. I'd expect that the cloud-based offerings would be an ongoing fee and the device/software solutions would be an up-front fee with an ongoing maintenance fee. |
|||
07-15-2010, 12:55 AM
Post: #28
|
|||
|
|||
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance?
After my last post in the "start render" topic i ended up finding a link that talked about browser buffering if the charset is not found... Well it just so happens that apparently my dev server wasn't setup to send the http charset header. I added that and was curious to see if it affected my IE8 results and guess what:
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/100714...1/details/ It decreased my total load time on average by 600-700 ms! Thats quite an improvement, all from just adding the charset header. The results are still 100-200 ms slower than the IE7 tests, but that may just be from the specific way i'm maxing out the connections for 2 http connections. On a side note, the above test shows why i'd recommend deferring the facebook "like" button using something like window.onload. Otherwise the thing is a performance menace, it either times out or takes forever to load. |
|||
07-15-2010, 04:56 AM
Post: #29
|
|||
|
|||
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance?
Wow - very cool. We need to start keeping track of these kernels of knowledge. I should have a wiki page set up soon where we can start to aggregate the knowledge in a central place.
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)