Current time: 11-24-2020, 06:35 AM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
IE8 == Worse Performance?
06-27-2010, 02:15 AM
Post: #5
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance?
(06-26-2010 11:45 PM)jarrod1937 Wrote:  Which script exactly? The only thing i see is the lt ie7 conditonal statement, can those cause image downloading to be blocked? Keep in mind the link in the test goes straight to our old, currently live, site. On the old site there is some inline javascript right after the css, but it has been removed in our new site (the one in that test).

This right at the end of your head:

<script type="text/javascript" language="JavaScript">
function popUp(URL) {
day = new Date();
id = day.getTime();
eval("page" + id + " = window.open(URL, '" + id + "', 'toolbar=0,scrollbars=0,location=0,statusbar=0,menubar=0,resizable=1,width=730,h​eight=618,left = 275,top = 203');");
}</script>


(06-26-2010 11:45 PM)jarrod1937 Wrote:  Yeah, i've read up on css data embeding, but considering it only works on IE8 (for the IE browser family), it is not worth the extra development effort to create an maintain such a system. I'm sticking with css sprites for now.

Actually, it's not as well known but IE supports Multi-part documents (MHTML). Not sure how far back the support goes but I know at least 6, 7 and 8 all support it.

Here is a reasonably good write-up on it: http://www.phpied.com/mhtml-when-you-nee...and-under/

Make sure to read through the comments though as there are a few tweaks you need to consider on Vista.

The great thing about it (and data uri's) is that you can use it for your product images as well, not just the kinds of things you normally sprite.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
IE8 == Worse Performance? - jarrod1937 - 06-26-2010, 05:00 AM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - pmeenan - 06-26-2010, 12:55 PM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - jarrod1937 - 06-26-2010, 11:45 PM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - pmeenan - 06-27-2010 02:15 AM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - jarrod1937 - 06-27-2010, 05:17 PM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - pmeenan - 06-27-2010, 06:19 AM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - pmeenan - 06-27-2010, 10:32 AM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - pmeenan - 06-27-2010, 11:14 PM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - leonid - 06-29-2010, 06:54 PM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - Aptimize - 07-02-2010, 03:42 PM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - pmeenan - 07-02-2010, 09:35 PM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - leonid - 06-29-2010, 10:11 PM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - pmeenan - 06-29-2010, 10:38 PM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - leonid - 06-29-2010, 10:44 PM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - jarrod1937 - 06-30-2010, 12:44 AM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - jarrod1937 - 07-02-2010, 05:17 AM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - pmeenan - 07-02-2010, 05:35 AM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - jarrod1937 - 07-02-2010, 06:15 AM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - pmeenan - 07-02-2010, 09:52 AM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - jarrod1937 - 07-03-2010, 12:05 AM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - pmeenan - 07-06-2010, 10:31 PM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - jarrod1937 - 07-15-2010, 12:55 AM
RE: IE8 == Worse Performance? - pmeenan - 07-15-2010, 04:56 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)