What do you want to see next?

[mbourne]

First, thank you for an excellent tool.

Currently, the impression given in the first results page at the top near the color-coded "First byte time", "Keep-alive", etc section for a particular page could be that everything is mostly OK, when in reality, the page may be a disaster from a user and loading point of view.

For example, this result:

https://www.webpagetest.org/result/17111...a143f722e/

Those color-coded results indicate most things are OK, when the page timed out after 145 seconds, there was 5.7 MB of stuff to download, and there were 1562 requests from 423 connections.

How about adding an "overall score" based on your "speed index" or "First interactive" or perhaps some weighted score of everything you track?

That would send a clearer message of the loading quality in cases such as this example.