- URL: https://superseeds.com/
- Date: 06/08/22 18:32:10
Experiment Impact (Notable changes between experiment and control)
|Start Render||First Contentful Paint||Speed Index||Largest Contentful Paint||Total Blocking Time||Visual Complete||Fully Loaded||Render-Blocking Requests|
Note: This experiment had a 0.17s difference in response time between the median experiment and control runs, which can make other metric changes seem more significant than they really are. To examine the variability of response times in all test runs, you can plot full results. Or, you can view this comparison with TTFB removed from relevant metric comparisons.
Here's how your overall opportunities look after this experiment:
Jump to Opportunities by Category:
Is it Quick? Not bad...
This site took little time to connect and deliver initial code. It began rendering content with little delay. The largest contentful paint time was slower than ideal.
- Opportunities 6
- Tips 6
- Pro Experiments 10
Is it Usable? Needs Improvement.
This site had minor layout shifts.It took a long time to become interactive. It had 5 accessibility issues, 1 critical. 17.55% of HTML was generated client-side, delaying usability.
- Opportunities 3
- Tips 3
- Pro Experiments 3
Is it Resilient? Not bad...
This site had zero render-blocking 3rd party requests.It had 12 security issues, 5 high-priority. Dependence on client-generated HTML risks fragility.
- Opportunities 2
- Tips 2
- Pro Experiments 4
Filmstrip Comparison (Experiment vs. Control)
Adjust Filmstrip Settings
- Visual change
- Visual change + Layout Shift
- Largest Contentful Paint
- Largest Contentful Paint + Layout Shift