- URL: https://www.festfoods.com/
- Date: 06/14/22 02:04:23
Experiment
- ExperimentSettings: motog4
v102
4G
Virginia USA
More
- First View only
- Test runs: 3
- Connectivity: 9000/9000 Kbps, 170ms Latency
- Custom Metrics
Related Links: Original (Control Run), Original Test
View:
Experiment Results
Experiment Impact (Notable changes between experiment and control)
Start Render | First Contentful Paint | Speed Index | Largest Contentful Paint | Cumulative Layout Shift | Total Blocking Time | Page Weight | Blocking Requests |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.7sFasterExperiment:4.5sControl:10.2s | 5.72sFasterExperiment:4.43sControl:10.15s | 6.05sFasterExperiment:5.27sControl:11.32s | 5.84sFasterExperiment:5.82sControl:11.66s | 0.332BetterExperiment:0.086Control:0.418 | 0.24sFasterExperiment:3.46sControl:3.7s | 630KBLighterExperiment:2672KBControl:3302KB | 4MoreExperiment:8Control:4 |
Remaining Opportunities
Here's how your overall opportunities look after this experiment:
Jump to Opportunities by Category:
Is it Quick? Needs Improvement.
This site was quick to connect and deliver initial code. It began rendering content with little delay. There were no render-blocking requests. The largest content rendered later than ideal.
- Opportunities 8
- Tips 8
- Pro Experiments 8
Is it Usable? Needs Improvement.
This site had minor layout shifts. It took a long time to become interactive. It had 1 accessibility issues, none serious. Some HTML was generated after delivery, potentially delaying usability.
- Opportunities 4
- Tips 4
- Pro Experiments 4
Is it Resilient? Not bad...
This site had no render-blocking 3rd party requests that could be a single point of failure. It had 3 security issues, 3 low-priority. Some HTML was generated after delivery, which can cause fragility.
- Opportunities 2
- Tips 2
- Pro Experiments 4
Filmstrip Comparison (Experiment vs. Control)
Adjust Filmstrip Settings
Filmstrip key:
- Visual change
- Visual change + Layout Shift
- Largest Contentful Paint
- Largest Contentful Paint + Layout Shift
|