- URL: https://www.fedex.com/en-us/home.html
- Date: 09/20/22 14:35:15
- ExperimentSettings: motog4v1054GVirginia USA
- First View only
- Test runs: 3
- Connectivity: 9000/9000 Kbps, 170ms Latency
- Custom Metrics
Related Links: Original (Control Run), Original Test
Experiment Impact (Notable changes between experiment and control)
|Start Render||First Contentful Paint||Speed Index||Largest Contentful Paint||Cumulative Layout Shift||Total Blocking Time||Page Weight|
Note: The metric comparisons above exclude differences in response time that exist between the median experiment and control runs of this experiment. View this comparison with TTFB differences included.
Here's how your overall opportunities look after this experiment:
Jump to Opportunities by Category:
Is it Quick? Needs Improvement.
This site was very slow to connect and deliver initial code. It began rendering content with little delay. There were 4 render-blocking requests. The largest content rendered later than ideal.
- Opportunities 5
- Tips 5
- Pro Experiments 5
Is it Usable? Needs Improvement.
This site had major layout shifts. It took little time to become interactive. It had 7 accessibility issues, 3 critical. HTML content was mostly generated server-side.
- Opportunities 3
- Tips 3
- Pro Experiments 3
Is it Resilient? Looks great!
This site had no render-blocking 3rd party requests that could be a single point of failure. It had no security issues. HTML content was mostly generated server-side.
- Opportunities 0
- Tips 0
- Pro Experiments 0
Filmstrip Comparison (Experiment vs. Control)
Adjust Filmstrip Settings
- Visual change
- Visual change + Layout Shift
- Largest Contentful Paint
- Largest Contentful Paint + Layout Shift