- URL: https://www.cnn.com/
- Date: 10/05/22 17:41:12
Experiment Impact (Notable changes between experiment and control)
|Start Render||First Contentful Paint||Speed Index||Largest Contentful Paint||Total Blocking Time||Visual Complete||Fully Loaded||Page Weight|
Note: The metric comparisons above exclude differences in response time that exist between the median experiment and control runs of this experiment. View this comparison with TTFB differences included.
Here's how your overall opportunities look after this experiment:
Jump to Opportunities by Category:
Is it Quick? Needs Improvement.
This site was quick to connect and deliver initial code. It began rendering content with considerable delay. The largest contentful paint time was slower than ideal.
- Opportunities 6
- Tips 6
- Pro Experiments 9
Is it Usable? Needs Improvement.
This site had good layout stability.It took a long time to become interactive. It had 7 accessibility issues, 2 critical. 40.4% of HTML was generated client-side, delaying usability.
- Opportunities 3
- Tips 3
- Pro Experiments 3
Is it Resilient? Not bad...
This site had zero render-blocking 3rd party requests.It had 3 security issues, 3 low-priority. Dependence on client-generated HTML risks fragility.
- Opportunities 2
- Tips 2
- Pro Experiments 4
Filmstrip Comparison (Experiment vs. Control)
Adjust Filmstrip Settings
- Visual change
- Visual change + Layout Shift
- Largest Contentful Paint
- Largest Contentful Paint + Layout Shift